Open Access   Article Go Back

A Comparative Study of E-Learning Methods with Traditional Learning

Ramesh Thakur1

Section:Review Paper, Product Type: Journal Paper
Volume-3 , Issue-2 , Page no. 90-93, Feb-2015

Online published on Feb 28, 2015

Copyright © Ramesh Thakur . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View
PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

  • IEEE Citation
  • MLA Citation
  • APA Citation
  • BibTex Citation
  • RIS Citation

IEEE Style Citation: Ramesh Thakur, “A Comparative Study of E-Learning Methods with Traditional Learning,” International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol.3, Issue.2, pp.90-93, 2015.

MLA Style Citation: Ramesh Thakur "A Comparative Study of E-Learning Methods with Traditional Learning." International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering 3.2 (2015): 90-93.

APA Style Citation: Ramesh Thakur, (2015). A Comparative Study of E-Learning Methods with Traditional Learning. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 3(2), 90-93.

BibTex Style Citation:
@article{Thakur_2015,
author = {Ramesh Thakur},
title = {A Comparative Study of E-Learning Methods with Traditional Learning},
journal = {International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering},
issue_date = {2 2015},
volume = {3},
Issue = {2},
month = {2},
year = {2015},
issn = {2347-2693},
pages = {90-93},
url = {https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=5565},
publisher = {IJCSE, Indore, INDIA},
}

RIS Style Citation:
TY - JOUR
UR - https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=5565
TI - A Comparative Study of E-Learning Methods with Traditional Learning
T2 - International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering
AU - Ramesh Thakur
PY - 2015
DA - 2015/02/28
PB - IJCSE, Indore, INDIA
SP - 90-93
IS - 2
VL - 3
SN - 2347-2693
ER -

VIEWS PDF XML
2148 2202 downloads 2131 downloads
  
  
           

Abstract

E-learning based methods offer important teaching methods. E-learning offers pupils to have interactive e- content that comprises of multimedia. E-learning has great impact on learning process. The present work presents a comparative study of e-learning based methods with traditional teaching methods. The comparative study is performed on various user groups confirms the preference of e-learning based methods over traditional teaching methods. The feedback of the two methods is collected from different user groups consisting of researchers, students, instructors, and staff. E-learning based methods offered better feedback as compared to traditional teaching methods.

Key-Words / Index Term

E-learning; Traditional learning; LMS; Palmtops; WebGuru

References

[1] A. Edmundson, “Globalized e-learning cultural challenges”, (USA: Idea Group Inc), 2007.
[2] D. Picar, “E-Learning and Motivation”, White Paper, ITEC at SFSU, 2004.
[3] Helwan University, http://www.helwan.edu.eg/english/
[4] H Li, J. Masters, "ELearning and knowledge management in the early years: Where are we and where should we go", Knowledge Management and eLearning: An International Journal, Vol. 1, Issue 4, pp. 245-250, 2009.
[5] K. Cheng, “A Research Study on Students Level of Acceptance in Applying E-Learning for Business Courses – A Case Study on a Technical College in Taiwan”, Journal of American Academy of Business, Vol. 8, Issue 2, pp: 265-270, 2006.
[6] K.H. Fee, “Delivering E-Learning: A Complete Strategy for Design Application and Assessment, London and Philadelphea”, Kogan Page, 2005.
[7] M. Nehme, “E-Learning and Students’ Motivation”, 20 Legal Education Review, pp. 223-239, SSRN- id2347142, 2010.
[8] S.Z. Keith, "Self-assessment materials for use in portfolios", Primus, Vol. 6, Issue 2, pp. 178-192, June 1996.
[9] T. FitzPatrick, "Key Success Factors of eLearning in Education: A Professional Development Model to Evaluate and Support eLearning", US-China Education Review, Vol. A, Issue 9, pp. 789-795, 2012.